Significados de blinded reviewers em inglês

Two blinded reviewers separately analyzed maximum-intensity-projection hybrid MR angiograms and DSA images.

Two independent blinded reviewers assessed the image quality of each segment.

Subject performance was scored from video by 2 blinded reviewers using a composite tool.

Videos were scored by 2 blinded reviewers using a composite tool and global rating scale.

For blinded reviewers compared with truth readers, there was no difference for lesion detection among the reconstruction algorithms.

The ultrasound scans were interpreted by two blinded reviewers to evaluate sonographic callus features with agreement determined by weighted kappa.

Randomized images were presented to two independent blinded reviewers to detect and categorize the appearance of lesions and to score lesion conspicuity.

The ICC of SBC at six-weeks with four blinded reviewers was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.91).

Conclusions: This is the first study to establish time specific ultrasound fracture findings with a repeatable technique and assess the agreement between blinded reviewers.

The poor coefficient of interobserver reliability for the time at RCP confirmed the great difficulty felt by the 3 blinded reviewers for the RCP determination.

A further validation study was undertaken by four blinded reviewers using the intraclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC) using the most clinically relevant findings of the pilot work.

Outcomes were the numbers of first-place rankings among all 3 catheters and scores on individual echogenicity criteria as assessed by 2 blinded reviewers.

Blinded reviewers interpreted CA to determine the IRA and CMR to determine the location of infarction on a 17-segment model.