Significados de using the quality em inglês

Quality of life was evaluated using the quality of life scale.

Study quality was assessed using the quality evaluation method recommended in the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 (Higgins, 2011).

Data extraction: Methodological bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.

Quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Risk of bias assessments will be completed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.

Studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 checklist and START recommendations.

Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Index.

Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.

An assessment of quality of life was made using the Quality of Well Being Scale, as previously reported.

Evidence was rated by two investigators using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS).

The methodological quality of the included papers was assessed using the Quality Assessment and Validity Tool for Cross-sectional Studies.

In addition, patients had undergone psychopathologic assessment and were screened for quality of life using the Quality of Well Being scale.

We appraised the quality of studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

Following eligibility assessments of the studies, quality appraisals were performed on the included studies using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 method.