1
General practice guidelines support the general practitioners' role to offer CRC screening.
2
In-person interviews were used to assess self-reported CRC screening behavior.
3
Detection of molecular markers in stool samples is a promising strategy for CRC screening.
4
The control group received general information about CRC screening.
5
Success of CRC screening is dependent on colonoscopy quality.
6
Results: Fifty-eight percent of eligible patients completed a CRC screening test in 2012, most by FIT.
7
We aimed to evaluate the benefits of this transition based on the Wallonia-Brussels-organised CRC screening programme.
8
Face-to-face interviews were performed to assess the utilization rate of CRC screening by each screening modality.
9
Low awareness of CRC screening tests is a risk factor for symptomatic detection of colon cancer.
10
National health insurance reform should strive towards a system that expands access to recommended CRC screening tests.
11
It will be important to continue to investigate factors associated with up-to-date CRC screening by each modality.
12
Those with a greater number of PCP visits had higher rates of CRC screening at all sites.
13
Women were asked questions about their CRC screening history and their knowledge and beliefs concerning CRC screening.
14
Just over 51% of beneficiaries received interval-appropriate CRC screening.
15
Measures: Demographic, clinical, PCP visit, and CRC screening data were obtained from electronic health records and administrative databases.
16
Conclusions: Efforts must continue to increase women's knowledge of both CRC screening tests and colon cancer risk factors.
