Conclusions: Our data are consistent with current biomechanical concepts of intracranialinjury.
2
There was no evidence of intracranialinjury in the 35H group.
3
Patients: Twelve children with intracranialinjury secondary to child abuse.
4
Scalp swelling, in particular, has been associated with intracranialinjury.
5
Children younger than 2 years appear to have a higher risk of intracranialinjury following minor head trauma.
6
These results suggest that COx may be an acceptable substitute for Mx monitoring in patients with acute intracranialinjury.
7
Twenty-three of these 180 patients underwent neuroimaging, and seven had an intracranialinjury (including one ischemic stroke).
8
Rarely, diabetes insipidus can manifest as a new entity months later in patients who have previously had an intracranialinjury or operation.
9
ICD-10-based ICISS had some disadvantages in predicting outcomes among patients with intracranialinjuries.
10
Initially missed intracranialinjuries were rare, and none needed neurosurgery or intensive care.
11
For patients with intracranialinjuries, the predictive power of ICD-10-based ICISS was relatively low because of differences in the classifying system between ICD-10 and ICD-9CM.