We systematically reviewed 31 adult randomised clinical trials of the i-gel(®) vs laryngealmaskairway.
2
The optimal size selection of laryngealmaskairway (LMA) based on body weight is not always applicable.
3
After anesthesia induction, a common laryngealmaskairway or laryngealmaskairway-Supreme(TM) was inserted and mechanically ventilated.
4
Conclusion: In children with mechanical ventilation, laryngealmaskairway-Supreme(TM) can be effectively applied to maintain a good airway.
5
In the operating room, paramedic students placed a laryngealmaskairway or i-gel device in random order in sequential patients.
6
The laryngealmaskairway was used to perform fiberoptic removal of bronchial foreign bodies (peanuts) in two pediatric patients.
7
Objective: To compare the efficacy of laryngealmaskairway-Supreme(TM) versus common laryngealmaskairway in children with general anesthesia.
8
In simulated infant cardiac arrests, paramedic students placed an endotracheal tube, an i-gel or a laryngealmaskairway in random order.
9
Results: The laryngealmaskairway provided a patent airway throughout the procedure in 52 (96.4%) patients.
10
These cases suggest that laryngealmaskairway is useful in maintaining a secure airway during the removal of bronchial foreign bodies in children.
11
The aim of this retrospective analysis is to report the efficacy and complications associated with the use of the laryngealmaskairway in this procedure.
12
Laryngealmaskairway offers easy access to the airway, safe respiratory management and direct visualization of the airway during bronchoscopic procedures.
13
Laryngealmaskairway allows the use of larger bronchoscopes than can usually be used for children when bronchoscopy is performed through an endotracheal tube.