Initiative supporting LGBTQIA+ people in STEMM Fields in Australia.
1This review revealed the heterogeneity describing and defining the nature of PC-QIs.
2Discussion and conclusion: QIs may provide useful measures of workload and service performances.
3Conclusions: Methodological quality of the development of most QIs is poor.
4Avanessians is a partner who joins QIS from Goldman's securities division.
5The National Science Foundation is also awarding $1 million to QIS education.
6Research is needed to continue the development and implementation of PC-QIs for healthcare quality improvement.
7It is anticipated that implementation of these QIs will improve the quality of AF care.
8A long list of 37 QIs, in the areas of structure, process, and outcome were developed.
9Currently, QIs with highest methodological quality are in the areas of pain management and medical imaging.
10Significant variation in the adherence rates across practice sites was observed in five of 11 QIs.
11Knowledge translation activities are now under way to promote utilization of the QIs and ultimately improve CR care.
12Conclusion: The identification of PC-QIs is a key first step in laying the groundwork to develop evidence-based PC-QIs.
13Materials and methods: Two structure, 10 process and 2 outcome QIs were elaborated.
14Nine guideline-based quality targets serving as rate-based QIs were initially defined, reviewed annually and modified or expanded accordingly.
15Through a consensus process, the working group excluded 8 QIs based on this feedback, and several others were revised.
16Medical records of new patients with NSCLC seen in 2006 were retrospectively reviewed for the adherence to these QIs.