Encara no tenim significats per a "venereal act".
1Objection 1: It would seem that no venereal act can be without sin.
2Now every venereal act is a great hindrance to virtue.
3Therefore no venereal act can be without sin.
4Therefore, seemingly, no venereal act is without sin.
5But in the venereal act a man uses only what is his own, except perhaps in adultery or rape.
6Now original sin is transmitted to children by concupiscence, without which no venereal act is possible, as Augustine declares (De Nup.
7For the venereal act consists in the emission of semen which is the surplus from food, according to the Philosopher (De Gener.
8We may also reply that "lasciviousness" relates to certain acts circumstantial to the venereal act, for instance kisses, touches, and so forth.
9Whether the Lust That Is About Venereal Acts Can Be a Sin?
10Therefore neither can there be any sin in venereal acts.
11Objection 1: It would seem that lust about venereal acts cannot be a sin.
12Therefore there can be no sin in venereal acts, and consequently lust is no sin.
13Whether No Venereal Act Can Be Without Sin?
Aquesta col·locació està formada per: