1
Data were analyzed by way of χ2 tests and multivariable regression analysis.
2
Differences between groups were estimated using the χ2 test or Student's t-test
3
In the case of DNA, the χOL4 correction gives only partial improvement.
4
Risk factors were evaluated using χ2 and Wilcoxon tests and multivariable logistic regression.
5
Statistical analysis included χ2 tests and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
6
Analyses of estimated annual complication rates were made using χ tests.
7
Descriptive statistics were compared using χ2 and independent sample t tests.
8
The multi-dimensional χ distributions and Top8000 reference dataset are freely available on GitHub.
9
Unconditional multivariate logistic regression analyses and χ 2 tests were used for comparisons.
10
The genotype and allele frequencies were evaluated using the χ2 tests.
11
Clinically relevant outcomes were compared with a t or χ test.
12
Data were collected using contingency tables, and the χ test was used as appropriate.
13
Statistical analysis included t tests or χ tests as appropriate and a multivariate analysis.
14
The rates across patient groups were compared using χ2 test.
15
Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and χ2 and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used where appropriate.
16
Pearson χ test and Student's t-testwere used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.