Keen, animal experimentation is always practised without cruelty or abuse.

Under what restrictions would the British Medical Journal of that day permit animal experimentation?

It is not to prevent animal experimentation, but only to prevent the abuse of it.

But there must have been a stupendous ignorance concerning the past history of animal experimentation.

The above caption defines the attitude of the Society to-day toward the practice of ' animal experimentation.'

So we won't do any more animal experimentation.

But we are not driven to accept one or the other of these definitions of animal experimentation.

Take, for example, the opinion held to-day by the great majority of young physicians concerning animal experimentation.

A teddy bear with his eyes and mouth sewn shut was handing out flyers protesting animal experimentation.

In the year 1906, a Royal Commission was appointed by King Edward to investigate the practice of animal experimentation.

What is the attitude of the author toward cruelty in animal experimentation, or to the secrecy of the laboratory?

Of Lister's extreme antipathy to the antivivisectionists and to th erestriction of animal experimentation there can be no doubt.

But can anyone call this paragraph a fair statement of Dr. Bigelow's "later views" on animal experimentation?

Suggested form of report, to be made quarterly by the responsible head of each Institution wherein animal experimentation is authorized.

We who are assembled here to-day, certainly are not forgetful of other cruelties than those which pertain to animal experimentation.

Down with animal experimentation!