Groups representing pharmaceutical and biotech companies called the proposal a political gesture.

Stadium opponents, including last-minute visitor Ralph Nader, called the proposal corporate welfare.

The administration called the proposal a starting point for negotiations.

Chavez, a fierce U.S. critic, and a group of leftists called the proposal an aggression.

Officials had called the proposal "the most significant deregulatory proposal" of the Trump administration.

One European source called the proposal "insulting" and said it could accelerate the tariff war.

Critics have called the proposal blatantly anti-Muslim.

He called the proposal "only a first step".

The auto industry, through its trade group, has called the proposal unworkable because of potential cost and technological challenges.

Rival Buttigieg has called the proposal an unrealistic "shiny object," a description that prompted a sharp exchange.

Dana called the proposal unacceptable, however, and it is not clear that it will change the stand-off over the bonds.

Casino called the proposal "illegal" and expressed its disappointment with Diniz for negotiating a deal without its authorization.

Even German Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel called the proposal "a secondary front and a trivialization of the climate problem."

XPO called the proposal "unnecessary," saying that existing policies and procedures already provide a framework for preventing workplace harassment.

Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen called the proposal "absurd", prompting Trump to cancel a planned visit to the country.

Gove indicated he had some sympathy for the foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, who called the proposal "crazy" this week.