Meanings of human praxis in English

The globality of human praxis is not a scenario invented by some entrepreneur.

Embodied in literacy, language accounts for the ever-deepening specialization and fragmentation of human praxis.

Constituted in human praxis, notation became a reality with an apparent life of its own.

Through language, this experience was projected against the background of many different forms of human praxis.

The possibility of meaning (intended, assigned) stems from the establishment of language within human praxis.

Exchanging goods pertinent to survival corresponds to a scale of human praxis that guarantees coherence and homogeneity.

The current use of images results from the new exigencies of human praxis and developments in visualization technology.

This happened simultaneously with the reification of many other forms of human praxis: religion, the judiciary, the military.

The pragmatic framework of current human praxis is based on the structural characteristics of this higher scale of humankind.

A growing number and a variety of mediating elements in human praxis challenge our understanding of what we do.

The sequential nature of language, in particular its embodiment in literacy, no longer suits human praxis as its universal measure.

Religion consecutively constituted its own domain of human praxis, with its own division of labor, and its own frame of reference.

At the same time, it is constitutive, together with many other elements of human praxis: biological endowment, heuristics and logic, dialectic, training.

Internally motivated developments, as well as those rooted in forms of human praxis other than geometry, resulted in the constitution of many geometric languages.

But what is only an example of how language can become an end in itself has become a very significant development in human praxis.

The underlying structure of human praxis that determined the need for literacy also determined the need for appropriate means of expression, communication, and signification.