TermGallery
English
English
Spanish
Catalan
Portuguese
Russian
EN
English
Español
Català
Português
Русский
1
Methods: The meta-analysis followed the
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
2
Review methods: The
Preferred
reporting
Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guided the review.
3
The study was based on
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses diagram.
4
The
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.
5
We followed the
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
6
The
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.
7
The
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.
8
The study is reported according to the
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
9
We used the
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement to guide this review.
10
This review conforms to the
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA).
11
This study conforms to the
preferred
reporting
items for integrative reviews described by Whitemore and Knafl.
12
Data extraction: The
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for data extraction.
13
Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to
Preferred
Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
14
Results were reported using the
preferred
reporting
systems for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
15
Methods: This protocol was guided by the
preferred
reporting
items for protocols for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes.
16
The review follows the
preferred
reporting
items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines.