1
Methods: A prospective database was established, and data were retrospectively reviewed.
2
Study design: A prospective database of patients undergoing IPHC has been maintained since 1991.
3
Method: Retrospective review of data stored on a prospective database.
4
Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database (Canadian Task Force classification III).
5
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospective database.
6
Clinical and pathologic factors were retrieved from a prospective database.
7
Methods: A prospective database of consecutive laparoscopic resections performed for colon cancer was reviewed.
8
Methods: This study was based on a prospective database of patients with severe, biopsy-proven AH.
9
Methods: A prospective database of CD patients was analyzed.
10
Design: Descriptive report and analysis of a prospective database.
11
Methods: We reviewed our experience with antegrade LIE, using an institutional research board-approved prospective database.
12
We continue enrolling patients in our prospective database to strengthen the power of our outcomes analysis.
13
Objective: To report our outcomes with small diameter, actively deflectable flexible ureterorenoscopy from a prospective database.
14
Patient characteristics were collected retrospectively from digital patient files and a prospective database of haemodialysis patients.
15
Methods: A prospective database of consecutive ASD patients was analyzed in conjunction with a normative spine database.
16
Study design: Retrospective review of prospective database.
