With vitalism dead, the extension of this logic to medicine was inevitable.

Biologists don't turn down the theory of vitalism, do they?

The most startling form of cultural vitalism was Italian.

Of course, this did not imply mysticism or vitalism.

Something like a new vitalism is making headway both on the Continent and in Great Britain.

And vitalism will always rise up against rationalism; reason will always find itself confronted by will.

The first alternative is compatible with thoroughgoing vitalism.

I'd always thought of vitalism as a nineteenth-century relic-inthe same category as leeches and phrenology.

The attitude, however, seems to smack of vitalism, and Roux, as we have seen, is no vitalist.

Now, in Spencer, evolution gave us a vitalist mechanic or mechanical vitalism, and the appeal seemed cut off.

Yet the word ritual does not, as normally used, convey to our minds this notion of intense vitalism.

When you looked at it that way, as many did, it gave rise to an uncomfortable deja-vu, namely, vitalism.

Then vitalism sort of crept back into things again when the AI discussions arose in the middle of the past century.

The official term is "vitalism."

With these views were associated the Dogmatic School of Medicine, and the name of Hippocrates, and this belief corresponds to modern vitalism.

In this reaffirmation of vitalism there might be a future, yes, an individual future, yet it was far from the smug conception of salvation.