Aún no tenemos significados para "eligible studies".
1Results: Data on 692 NSCLC patients were collected from six eligible studies.
2Results: The majority of the eleven eligible studies were randomized controlled trials.
3Methods: We systematically searched four databases for eligible studies to perform meta-analysis.
4Because of the small number of eligible studies, broader searches were conducted.
5Authors from eligible studies were invited to collaborate and share patient-level data.
6Diversity of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments was noted among the eligible studies.
7Results: Eighteen eligible studies were included, with a total of 882 patients.
8Screening and extraction of eligible studies was done independently and in duplicate.
9Key information of eligible studies was abstracted into a standard form.
10Two authors will independently screen search results and extract data from eligible studies.
11Five eligible studies were from the United Kingdom, and one was from Denmark.
12PubMed was searched up to July 2012 to identify eligible studies.
13A systematic search of Medline, Embase and CENTRAL was performed for eligible studies.
14Results: Of 10 eligible studies, two studies reported pedometer use and eight accelerometer use.
15Independent reviewer pairs charted data from eligible studies using a standardized data abstraction tool.
16All eligible studies were screened with risk of bias examined by two independent reviewers.
Esta colocación está formada por:
Eligible studies a través del tiempo
Eligible studies por variante geográfica
Estados Unidos de América