TermGallery
Inglés
Inglés
Español
Catalán
Portugués
Ruso
ES
English
Español
Català
Português
Русский
Group receiving research intervention.
experiment group
test group
study group
test subjects
treatment group
research group
treatment arm
control group
group type
1
Results: e
experimental
group
had 32 members, the same as the control.
2
Biomechanical test revealed no significant difference between
experimental
group
and normal group.
3
However, CIT and stimulation index were negatively correlated in each
experimental
group
.
4
Subjects in the
experimental
group
underwent an un-prepped flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsies.
5
In the
experimental
group
none of the animals suffered hyperacute rejection.
6
The
experimental
group
underwent HILP and excision; the control group had excision only.
7
A second
experimental
group
was designed at a higher cotinine concentration.
8
Subjects in the
experimental
group
were provided with opinionnaire during posttest.
9
Then the rats in the
experimental
group
were injured by SCI.
10
Results: Following strength training the
experimental
group
was significantly stronger than the control group.
11
The
experimental
group
received MBCT and antidepressants, while the control group received antidepressants only.
12
Results: In the
experimental
group
,
there were no definite metastases observed in muscle cells.
13
Also DXA revealed significantly higher bone mineral density of
experimental
group
than control group.
14
In addition to conventional therapy, the
experimental
group
received 16 hours of truncal exercises.
15
The
experimental
group
was given 8weeks of the meditation program.
16
Comparisons were made statistically between each
experimental
group
and normal proestrus (PE).
experimental
group
experimental