Electoral system in which each voter may vote for only one candidate, and the candidate who polls the most is elected, regardless of if they receive over half of the vote or not.
The debate developed the fact, that any provision for other than a mere pluralityvote would be unconstitutional.
2
The first amendment provided that a majority instead of a pluralityvote should nominate, a provision as unconstitutional as impracticable.
3
At issue for Calpers, which is urging a nonbinding proposal, is the pluralityvote rule at the iPad and iPhone maker.
4
Were a majority or even high percentage pluralityvote required to nominate, the Direct Primary law would have been made unconstitutional, because:
5
Calpers' non-binding proposal asks Apple to replace its pluralityvote rule in uncontested elections, and require election by a majority of total shares.