Neither of those Leeds figures has peacekeeping high on their cv.
2
This success, however, must surely take high rank on the trainer's CV.
3
Students should bring their CVs; teachers and guidance counsellors are also welcome.
4
Conclusions: Cardio-renal and cardio-hepatic interactions predicted CV events in aged HF patients.
5
It proved a bad week to issue his CV to prospective employers.
1
Objective: Our objective was to further delineate the cutaneous changes in RSD.
2
Conclusion: With heterogeneous clinical characteristics, IgG4-RSD is found in various organ systems.
3
Thus, RSD is an important agent for the treatment of osteoporosis.
4
The RSD exhibits the crossover at the long time region.
5
We propose that some ulcerations in patients with RSD may be factitial in origin.
1
The coefficientofvariation of these new assays decreased from values of approx.
2
The coefficientofvariation of cell size improved significantly 3 years after surgery.
3
The coefficientofvariation (CV) was used to determine the absolute variability.
4
A mean modified coefficientofvariation was calculated for each parameter and ROI size.
5
In terms of repeatability, PointCare NOW had a coefficientofvariation of 11%.
1
Results: Individual variations could not be explained by the interassay variationcoefficient in 26% of the patients.
2
The use of normalized ADC using the liver as reference organ resulted in the most restricted distribution of ADC values of cholangiocarcinomas ( variationcoefficient=16.6%).
Uso de relative standard deviation en inglés
1
The relativestandarddeviation for repeatability was found to meet European Union Directive requirements.
2
The relativestandarddeviation was less than 2%.
3
The biological variability as resulting from the relativestandarddeviation of the physiological concentrations of the ident …
4
The relativestandarddeviation was less than 10 % for antibiotics in the foodstuff and water samples.
5
In particular, the relativestandarddeviation (RSD) of the TAMSD can be utilized to study the long-time relaxation behavior.
6
We performed a relativestandarddeviation (RSD) analysis, for investigating the different components of the noise presented by the three systems.
7
Repeatability and reproducibility were calculated as the relativestandarddeviation of five measurements within the same day and 15 measurements across three days, respectively.
8
The recovery values ranged from 72.5% to 126.0%, and the relativestandarddeviation was between 0.3 and 11.5%.
9
The repeatability of the method was assessed for 34 mycotoxins by the relativestandarddeviation (RSD%) of the responses, and all presented satisfactory values.
10
The precision of the in vivo study was evaluated by intra- and inter-day assays and the percentages of relativestandarddeviation were all within 15%.
11
A comprehensive RNA modifications database of UV profiles and extinction coefficient is reported within a 2.3-5.2 % relativestandarddeviation.
12
Recovery of the proposed method for three concentration levels ranged between 97.46% and 106.88% with relativestandarddeviation 8.7% (low conc.
13
The limits of detection and quantification calculated from the relativestandarddeviation were 6000 and 20,000 haploid genome copies per gram of soil.
14
The relativestandarddeviation of results of all methods was better than 27% for applied doses in the range of 79-704 mGy.
15
The relativestandarddeviation was 3.4% (n=8) which indicated that the method had good precision for the analysis of trace Fe(III) in solution samples.
16
The linear range of this method was 0.60-180 ng ml-1 with a relativestandarddeviation of 1.2%, and the detection limit was 0.18 ng ml-1.