Мы используем Cookies Этот веб-сайт использует cookie-файлы, чтобы предлагать вам наиболее актуальную информацию. Просматривая этот веб-сайт, Вы принимаете cookie-файлы.
Total bacterial DNA was extracted from foremilk samples and swab samples of the teat canal.
2
Machine milk, foremilk, and stripping milk fractions in udders where both halves were healthy were compared.
3
The electrical conductivity values for the machine milk were intermediate and significantly different from conductivity of foremilk and stripping fractions.
4
Significant differences were observed in the SCC and electrical conductivity, but not in California mastitis test, between foremilk and stripping milk.
5
The log SCC of the machine milk did not differ from that of the foremilk fraction but was significantly less than the stripping milk.
6
Foremilk and hand stripping milks were taken from each individual teat; machine milk was taken from the entire udder.