1
Reproducibility was determined using mean weighted relative differences and intraclass correlation coefficients.
2
Further evidence for scalar timing was obtained using an intraclass correlation statistic.
3
High-fidelity simulation-based environment was used to test interrater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients.
4
Intrarater and inter-rater reliability were calculated by means of an intraclass correlation coefficient.
5
Reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots.
6
Statistical analysis: agreement was analyzed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman procedure.
7
Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement.
8
The kappa coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient were used to assess inter-rater reliability.
9
We evaluated the correlation between operators using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
10
Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.
11
Paired-sample Student's t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed.
12
The intraclass correlation coefficients for many indices were not significant.
13
The reproducibility of the computed 264 features was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
14
Measurement agreement and its dependence were assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC).
15
Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
16
Lesion measurement agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
