Значения термина partner abuse на английском

The focus group on its own doubled the awareness of partner abuse.

Background: Intimate partner abuse is very common among female patients in family practice.

To date, valid indicators of partner abuse of women are lacking.

Methods: Eighteen family doctors who participated in a training program on partner abuse were interviewed.

In general, doctors overlook the possibility of partner abuse.

Among those women, the prevalence of partner abuse went from 54 percent to six percent.

Conclusions: Training was the most significant determinant to improve awareness and identification of intimate partner abuse.

Practice implications: Training on partner abuse should be specifically tailored to change awareness, attitudes and consultation skills.

Research has also found that partner abuse often goes hand-in-hand with maternal depression, another risk factor for child abuse.

One in 10 women in a relationship said they have experienced some kind of partner abuse during the pandemic.

But their unconsciousness is nothing more than a reflection of our society's ignorance and acceptance of intimate partner abuse.

Results: The interviewees evaluated the training program to be useful in raising their awareness and suspect criteria on partner abuse.

Even the valuable tools that already exist might be tweaked or designed differently if intimate partner abuse were being taken into consideration.

Aim: To investigate whether awareness of intimate partner abuse, as well as active questioning, increase after attending focus group and training, or focus group only.

Objective: The aim of this study was to discover the ways in which a training program on intimate partner abuse affected a doctor's daily practice.

Jennifer McLaughlin, a forensic psychologist at Liverpool John Moores University, has published research showing a strong association between "intimate partner abuse" and risk of suicide.