1
The 95% limits of agreement between spatial CS and temporal CS values were assessed.
2
Differences between spatial CS and temporal CS values were determined with 95% limits of agreement.
3
Conclusions: For spatial CS and temporal CS, moderate to strong correlations were found, respectively, with reading speed in patients with maculopathies.
4
A proportional difference of 0.1 log units was found between spatial CS and temporal CS measurements.
5
Methods: The Mars test and temporal CS implementation of the C-Quant device were used to measure spatial CS and temporal CS, respectively.
6
Pearson's correlation analyses were performed between spatial CS or temporal CS, and reading speed and partial correlations controlled for age are presented.
7
The values for temporal CS were 0.08 and 0.13 log unit higher than those for spatial CS.
8
Methods: The Mars test and the temporal CS implementation of the C-Quant device were used to measure spatial CS and temporal CS, respectively.
9
The stronger correlation between spatial CS and reading speed is suggested to reflect a deterioration of both optical and neural factors with increasing age.
10
Coefficient of repeatability was 0.13 log units and 0.24 log units for spatial CS and temporal CS test, respectively.
11
The coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were 0.20 and 0.28 log unit ( spatial CS) and 0.33 and 0.35 log unit (temporal CS), respectively.
