These animals displayed no overt epidermal phenotype nor overexpression of K10.
2
Transfections with single genes demonstrated that these structures were generated by K10 alone.
3
Outcome measure: Validation of the K10 was the major outcome.
4
Sociodemographic factors were measured to assess if the K10 needed adjustment for factors such as age or gender.
5
Collectively, these data demonstrate that keratin K10 in vivo functions include the control of epithelial proliferation in skin epidermis.
6
DE-K10 is probable more sensitive than RKSE60 to distinguish populations that differ in degree of differentiation.
7
A modified version of seven items (K7) with four response categories would provide a psychometrically more robust scale than the original K10.
8
These results demonstrate that K1 and K10 have properties different from those described for other keratins and that epithelial IF are surprisingly dynamic structures.
9
Objective: The aim of this study was to translate, adapt and validate the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh.