We are using cookies This website uses cookies in order to offer you the most relevant information. By browsing this website, you accept these cookies.
These animals displayed no overt epidermal phenotype nor overexpression of K10.
2
Transfections with single genes demonstrated that these structures were generated by K10 alone.
3
Outcome measure: Validation of the K10 was the major outcome.
4
Sociodemographic factors were measured to assess if the K10 needed adjustment for factors such as age or gender.
5
Collectively, these data demonstrate that keratin K10 in vivo functions include the control of epithelial proliferation in skin epidermis.
6
DE-K10 is probable more sensitive than RKSE60 to distinguish populations that differ in degree of differentiation.
7
A modified version of seven items (K7) with four response categories would provide a psychometrically more robust scale than the original K10.
8
These results demonstrate that K1 and K10 have properties different from those described for other keratins and that epithelial IF are surprisingly dynamic structures.
9
Objective: The aim of this study was to translate, adapt and validate the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh.