1AFLP analysis allowed to distinguish 51 types and largely confirmed rep-typing results.
2Here, we present a systematic approach for obtaining such information from AFLP markers.
3This analysis was consistent with the AFLP analysis, although of much lower resolution.
4The AFLP analysis technique produced some degree of discrimination among F. tularensis subsp.
5The most promising AFLP marker was then selected for further characterization.
6Individual AFLP genotyping of the marker on all selected animals confirmed a significant difference.
7Thus, data from AFLP markers can be combined with microsatellite data for measuring genetic diversity.
8Phylogenetic analysis of the fluorescent AFLP results reveals five genetic groups in these group 1 bacilli.
9Seven primer combinations were used for AFLP analysis.
10The microsatellite-enriched library was constructed using the fast isolation by AFLP of sequences containing repeats method.
11The detailed protocol is presented with PCR results from a variable AFLP fragment from Bacillus anthracis.
12In contrast, S. globosa exhibited consistent global distribution of identical AFLP types, suggesting another type of dispersal.
13A reliable conversion procedure allowed five AFLP markers to be successfully converted into CAPS and SCAR markers.
14Screening of this population with PCR, RFLP and AFLP markers identified several plants with crossovers near Mi.
15In AFLP analysis, bacterial genomic DNA is digested with a restriction enzyme and ligated to adapter oligonucleotides.
16The percent similarities of the AFLP profiles of this subspecies compared to those of F. tularensis subsp.